Ethical Theories

This is a formal outline of ethical theories. It is included more as reference material. Student should be encouraged to read about these theories and apply as needed.

Ethical TheoryKey Originator(s)Core IdeaIT Example
Duty-Based (Deontology)Immanuel KantActions are inherently right or wrong based on rules/duties, regardless of the consequences.Refusing to install spyware on user devices because spying violates the universal rule of respecting user autonomy and privacy.
Utilitarianism (Utility)Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart MillAn action is good if it maximizes overall happiness, well-being, or “utility” for the greatest number of people.Implementing a predictive algorithm that slightly reduces privacy for a few but accurately predicts and prevents large-scale cybersecurity breaches for millions.
Virtue EthicsAristotleMorality is driven by character, habits, and integrity rather than strict rules or outcomes. “What would a good person do?”A software engineer voluntarily mentoring junior devs and practicing extreme honesty about system bugs, striving to be an excellent and honorable professional.
Social Contract TheoryThomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques RousseauMorality is based on a collective agreement (contract) to follow rules for mutual benefit and social order.Adhering to GDPR or data privacy laws, acknowledging that tech companies must respect societal rules to maintain public trust and operate in a stable economy.
Care Ethics (Additional)Carol GilliganFocuses on relationships, empathy, and protecting vulnerable individuals rather than abstract principles.Designing an app with robust accessibility features (for visually or hearing-impaired users), prioritizing the real needs and inclusion of a vulnerable user group.
Just Consequentialism (Additional)James MoorA hybrid framework created specifically for IT that filters options by duty (do no harm) and ranks the remaining choices by utility.Developing an AI system by first ensuring it does not violate human rights (duty), then tweaking it to maximize the efficiency of public transport (utility).

Contemporary Ethical Challenges

Student Exercise:

a. Ask students to consider their knowledge of modern teachnology and ask them to write 5 uses that may pose and ethical issue. (note: this would be a good one to do in groups and use tech to display the combined responses)

b. Ask the students to discuss issues displayed that might have particular improtant in schools.

The following documents discusses a range of ethical challenges that can arise in the modern digital world.

Contempory Ethical Issues

Student Exercise: The following table list a range of potential ethical issues.

note to teachers: it is suggested teachers use these ideas to develop examples and encourge students to apply the methodology as th

A contemporary collection of ethical problems

Ethical issueExample for discussion
1. AI-assisted homeworkA student uses ChatGPT to prepare an assignment, substantially rewrites it, but does not disclose using AI
2. Deepfake imagesStudents create a realistic fake video of a teacher making offensive remarks
3. Student privacyA school introduces software that monitors students’ online activity, including outside school hours
4. AI biasAn AI tool recommends which students should enter an advanced mathematics class, but its recommendations appear unfair
5. CyberbullyingA student forwards an embarrassing photograph from a private group chat
6. MisinformationA student circulates an AI-generated news report without checking whether it is genuine
7. Copyright and creativityStudents use AI to imitate an artist’s style for a competition
8. CybersecurityA student discovers a weakness in the school’s computer network and tests it without permission
9. Digital exclusionA school requires an expensive device that some families cannot afford
10. Environmental responsibilityA school replaces hundreds of functioning laptops to adopt new AI-enabled devices
11. AI companionshipA student becomes emotionally dependent on an AI companion that offers questionable advice
12. Staff use of AIA teacher uploads identifiable student work and personal details to an external AI service to generate reports

7.10 Supporting the activities with technology

The methodology does not depend on technology, but readily available tools may make the activities easier to organise.

Online forms can be used to present case studies, collect initial responses and record students’ reflections after discussion.

Responses can be compared to examine whether students have identified additional viewpoints, recognised competing ethical principles or developed stronger justifications.

Ethics Methodology

Definition of ethics: Ethics is a shared set of principles and values that helps us evaluate what is right and wrong, guiding our decisions, actions, and how we treat others.

Student Exercise:

a. Express the above definition in your own words and outline a situation that might involve a choice of ethical and unethical behaviour.

b. Break into small groups and consider the ideal of ‘shared’. How shared to you feel your ethics are.

New Refined Methodology

Step 1: Identify the people involved, their interests and the facts of the situation.

Step 2: Examine the situation from each person’s point of view.

Step 3: Compare viewpoints and identify any conflicting ethical principles.

Step 4: Compare the digital situation with a similar real-world situation.

Step 5: Construct an open scenario in which the different viewpoints can be explored.

Step 6: Decide on a course of action, justify it and reflect on the decision.

We will use the above on an example after the discussion on ethical principles

What are some ethical principles?

Theory related to ethical principles can be read here.

Applying the methodology

In the above document a distinguision made between clear cut ethical situation where it is clear what an ethical response would be and ethical dilemas where it is not clear what the ethical response should be.

Student Exercise applying the methodology

a. Clear Cut Ethical Situation: Manipulate a students image to show them in an embarrising situation and distribute it to a Social Media Site sed by many students at the school (note: the actually change made is left deliberatly vague)

Step 1: Identify the people involved, their interests and the facts of the situation.

People Involved: the student, creator/distributer, other students, teachers, parents, public

Step 2: Examine the situation from each person’s point of view.

Student: no control, no knowledge, being used for fun or ridicule, could be very upsetting, serious mental health consequences

Creator: in control/power, motive is fun? motive is to do harm, can’t know the impact, engaged in bullying

Other students: receivers, might be friends with student, become worried, develop mental health issues, might not like student, might re-send with degrogatory message etc

Teachers: wil not know, unitl brought to their attention, need to waste time investigating, need to support those effected, need to meet with creator, possibly with parents, possible medical people

Parents: may no know for some time, student not likely to reveal, notice change in student, get angry, need to support, incur costs for medical attention, ring school

Step 3: Compare viewpoints and identify any conflicting ethical principles.

The creator does not know the affect, student could be seriously effected, teachers and parents left in the dark, difficulty determining facts.

The key ethical principle is to no harm, don’t use others for your benefit.

Creator migh argue “just exercising my freedom of speech”, or student deserves it, it was just fun, just getting my own back, the student did same to me.

Step 4: Compare the digital situation with a similar real-world situation.

digital: easy to do, wide circulation, can be repeated, can’t be taken back

No computer involved: just a picture, limited exposure, can be removed, can more readily be seen, effects on student can be same.

Step 5: Construct an open scenario in which the different viewpoints can be explored.

Motivation of the creator is in conflict with the consequences. But what of the claim “student did it to me”?

The effects on the student were BAD to use our simple language from before, should be avoided.

Step 6: Decide on a course of action, justify it and reflect on the decision.

Ignore the claim just getting my own back for the minute.

The ethical principle violated is the notion of “do not harm”, the creators actions where unethical as they resulted in harm.

To consider the situation that both had done the same thing we can conclud both acted unethically as not acted to cause harm.

Student Exercise: repeat the methodology to consider the dilema outlined below. Do as group activity and report back.

An ethical dilema might be involved here to. Suppose a friend of the student wanted to report the person who bragged about sending the image, but they also know that student themselves had done the same thing but nobody knew this only you.

Thinking about your actions

Student Exercise:

Much has changed between the years 2000 and 2026 and beyond. Using technology is now common place, it was not so in 2000. When we use something normally we have a purpose: get homework done, send an invite to a party etc. Do we only act in our own interests, do we worry about having negative effects on others via our actions, with something new how do we know what consequences might flow from misuse?

  1. Ask students to research and construct a table with three columns. Column 1 Technology available 2000, Column2 Technology available in 2026, Column 3 what can you do digitally now you could not do in 2000.
  2. Let’s use a simple good/bad consequences of an action. e.g. be able to send emails to many people. Ask students to select 2 or 3 new pieces of technology and consider the possible good and bad actions. Ask why do you think some actions might be bad? Could be a group report to class activity

(note: if you use tech here what you want is to be able to display all ideas without forum hirearchies so the class can easily get an overview. Google Forms, make your own, is simple, needs a gmail teacher account, can see all responses.)

Three further simple examples to consider.

  • If you drop your wallet or purse what would expect the finder to do?
  • If you left your unlocked smart phone on your desk what would expect somebody that notices this do?
  • If someone invited you to participate in an online bullying session of a new student. How would you feel if you were the bullied student?

Introducing the refined Methodology

Step 1: Identify the people involved, their interests and the facts of the situation.

Step 2: Examine the situation from each person’s point of view.

Step 3: Compare viewpoints and identify any conflicting ethical principles.

Step 4: Compare the digital situation with a similar real-world situation.

Step 5: Construct an open scenario in which the different viewpoints can be explored.

Step 6: Decide on a course of action, justify it and reflect on the decision.

S

Is it real?

no punctuation is deliberate.

================================

illusions wash across our eyes

the mind is tricked to see

what’s not there it’s just a haze

of bits and bytes of nonsense

=============================

we expect the truth when we ask

but get a mix of apples and oranges

our tree is fake as are the fruits

from which we get our vitamin C

==============================

Our intentions are sent electric

without a motor or wheels

there is no highway on which to ride

across the way to the other side

=================================

turn it off or let it ride that is the question

confine it to a sandbox, but out it gets

snaking through the tightest hole

to wander with intent to find the can

to kick it over to the other side

===============================

We grunted, spoke, penned our words

minds truth was tricked

is the game of illusion up

as our mind starts downloading.